Archive for the ‘Real Estate Research’ Category

Are Savings Just Thin Air?

Thursday, April 25th, 2013

On a trip back to Scotland a couple of weeks ago, what jumped out at me was how much better the air quality was in comparison to Hong Kong.

This is far from a new topic, but realistically how do we address air quality in emerging Asia? In thinking of the interest groups and stakeholders involved this reminded me of the dilemma originally raised by ecologist Garrett Hardin. His theory tackled the socio-economic dilemma of a group of individuals when sharing a common resource. Known as “the tragedy of the commons,” this theory can be applied to a myriad of scenarios when society shares a common resource – in this case the wider environment.

In its simplest sense, the theory references the practice of medieval common grazing by herdsmen for their cattle. It goes something like this. Any single herder will have a personal motivation to add one more cow to his herd, because even if the results of adding additional cattle to his herd cause overgrazing and damage to the pastures, the herdsman receives all the economic benefit of adding those additional cattle, whilst the damage to the lands is shared by all.

Now, I’m not going to solve the air quality issues in Hong Kong in 500 words, but what is clear is that we all have a stake and responsibility in tackling these issues and this applies as much to real estate professionals just like myself. With a significant proportion of energy consumption being taken up by real estate, globally we have a duty and a responsibility to drive forward change to improve the impact we have on our “pastures.”

Now what Hardin did not address in his paper was technology. Technology provides solutions to problems. Yes we can legislate, but the winning argument in relation to real estate in this debate in my mind is simply the bottom line. When businesses start to see the savings and benefits to their bottom line of adopting more sustainable new technologies in real estate, adopting new best practice will just become the natural course. Technology is already moving fast and the real estate industry has some brilliant technologies at hand already.

The savings from sustainability are very real, not just on the impact we have on our “pastures” but on the bottom line. A great example is our new LEED Platinum office in Hong Kong. Our new office consumes 13% less energy per sq ft and better air quality has greatly improved the environment, indeed we’ve seen a 32% reduction in absenteeism.

I’m not saying technology has all the solutions now and that the payback times and the investment are not prohibitive at times. However, what is true is that the more it’s adopted, the more the costs will come down making it a more viable option.

A project we undertook in New York on the Empire State Building is a great example of how savings can be made even today. Not only did we deliver a project to improve sustainability which would pay for itself in three years by saving US$4.4m per annum in energy savings, the energy reduction and thus the impact on the planet, was in the region of 38%.

So the lesson is this, not only is the technology here to save us from a similar “tragedy of the commons,” but it’s improving every day. The savings to the bottom line are real and it’s up to us as real estate professionals to promote best practice in our industry. We can’t solve transport and factory pollution; however, with a little effort from all stakeholders, there will be some very tangible benefits for the wider environment and also the bottom line of developers, tenants and landlords – our clients.

About the author
Roddy Allan is a Director, Asia Pacific Research for Jones Lang LaSalle, based in Hong Kong.

Renaissance For Shanghai’s Hongqiao CBD?

Thursday, February 14th, 2013

Recent years have seen maturing urban infrastructure combine with strong office and retail demand to give rise to new commercial clusters along the periphery of Shanghai’s city centre. One of the most prominent emerging areas is Hongqiao, which has a unique history. Hongqiao, previously an important office and retail area in Shanghai, faded from prominence in the 1990s, but today returns stronger than ever. New developments are restoring Hongqiao to its former prominence.

Once a rural area in western Shanghai, Hongqiao was designated as a state-level development zone in 1986. Authorities took advantage of the zone’s location between Hongqiao Airport (Shanghai’s only international airport at the time) and Shanghai’s traditional centre to develop a commercial hub with exhibition space, offices, hotels, and diplomatic facilities. The 1990s saw a wave of development that cemented Hongqiao’s rise as one of Shanghai’s key early business districts. More than ten office towers were built, and the zone attracted a range of multinational companies like 3M, Chrysler, GE, and LG. In addition, at least half a dozen foreign consulates were established in the area. Hongqiao’s Friendship Department Store opened in 1994 and became the most high-end retail property in Shanghai, with international brands and imported products. As other areas like Lujiazui (the financial district) and Xujiahui (in the southwest) took centre stage in the late 1990s and early 2000s, demand and supply in Hongqiao’s office and retail sectors declined, and Hongqiao’s brightness began to fade (see chart below). The turning point came in 1999 when Pudong International airport, 60 km east, took over all international flights to Shanghai.

Hongqiao is experiencing a surge of construction of prime office and retail space that is giving it a new lease on life. Notable new mixed-use projects include L’avenue by LVMH, The HQ (Shanghai City Centre) by Treasury Holdings, GIFC Phase II (Takashimaya) by Gubei Group, Jin Hongqiao by APP and SOHO’s Tianshan Road Project. All of these have just completed or will complete within the next three years, doubling the retail stock of the area. We reclassified Hongqiao from a decentralised area to a part of Shanghai’s CBD in 2011, due to the comprehensive upgrade of the area’s business environment. For example, L’avenue will be home to the first Louis Vuitton and Tod’s stores in west Shanghai. Meanwhile, the commitment rate of GIFC Phase II’s office portion (70,000 sqm) has already exceeded 60%, higher than the average of other CBD projects that delivered in the same quarter.

Hongqiao’s profile will be further boosted by the rising prominence of the west Shanghai region, which is underpinned by the new Hongqiao Transportation Hub, including a hugely expanded airport. Tenants are attracted to Hongqiao for its new properties, strong government support, and large, wealthy population base. As a result, we expect that Hongqiao’s rental performance will remain sound and will experience stronger rental growth than most areas in Shanghai.


Source : Jones Lang LaSalle, Real Estate Intelligence Service

About the author
Evian Zhu is Assistant Manager in Jones Lang LaSalle’s research team in China, based in Shanghai.

Observations From The Ground: Occupier Demand For Retail Centre Space In Zhengzhou

Friday, February 1st, 2013

I recently visited Zhengzhou, a heavily industrialised city and the provincial capital of Henan in Central China. The city is the second largest in Central China (after Wuhan) and serves as one of the strategic transportation hubs in the region and the focal point of development in one of the most populous provinces in China with close to 100 million people.

Venturing beyond the glamour of the new business district and economic zones, however, we see near and medium-term risks of limited occupier demand for retail space in the city. As shown in the income distribution chart below (we recognise that there are inherent flaws with income data in China. However, available data do allow for some comparative analysis of underlying socio-economic structure between cities. For this analysis, we’ve excluded the low-income segment (< 30K), which accounts for roughly 80% of the urban population in Zhengzhou), while Zhengzhou is a provincial capital with an urban population of over 8 million residents (resident population is 8.9 million in 2011 (EIU), approximately 4 million resides in the city proper), it is considerably skewed towards the low income segment and relative to its more affluent provincial capital neighbours, with the absolute number of consumers quickly dropping off above the middle income bracket.

We readily observe the differences between the cities in the field. Across the board, brand diversity in Zhengzhou pales compared to some more vibrant inland cities including Wuhan and Chongqing, which themselves are a step below the wealthier Tier 2 capitals such as Nanjing and Chengdu. That is not to say that there is no demand for fast fashion brands or mid-market retailers in the city, just that other more affluent Tier 2 markets are potentially more attractive to retail brands for scalable expansion.

Therefore, while the aggregate consumer spending looks impressive at the city-level, prime retail developers and operators in the city are having a more difficult time attracting quality international mid- and mass-market fashion brands to Zhengzhou.

Arguably, as the city moves up the economic development curve, the absolute number of higher income consumers will increase, thus providing Zhengzhou with a larger pool of middle class consumers. However, income forecasts through 2020 suggest that even as Zhengzhou moves up the income ladder, the number of middle class consumers in other cities will grow even faster. Therefore relative to other wealthier cities, Zhengzhou won’t become more attractive, and we would expect brands to prioritise more affluent tier 2 cities for expansion above Zhengzhou in the near term.

My outlook for 2013-4: expect to see higher vacancy rates city-wide and a higher likelihood of delays in new mall openings due to low pre-commitment rates.

Retail snapshot: As of 2012YE, Zhengzhou has 1.2 million square metre of prime shopping mall stock, of which nearly 15% is vacant. The city is expected to add another million square metres of shopping mall space in the next two to three years.

About the author
Amy Pan is an Associate Director in Research and looks after Real Estate Intelligence Service (REIS) China for Jones Lang LaSalle. She is based in Shanghai.

A Brief Look Behind The Philippine Real Estate Market’s Growth In 2012

Thursday, January 17th, 2013

The past year has once again showed the resiliency of the Philippine real estate market amidst the uncertain global economic conditions. The robust performance of the Philippine economy, along with the positive performance of such key real estate demand drivers as the offshoring and outsourcing (O&O) industry and remittances from overseas Filipinos, continued to sustain the property sector’s growth momentum.

In 2012, the Philippine economy experienced various challenges and risks. Foremost among the threats was the fragile global economic environment caused by the sovereign debt crises in the Eurozone and the US debt and fiscal cliff problems. Moreover, the continued unrest in the Middle East, particularly Syria’s bloody civil war, threatened to affect remittances sent by overseas Filipinos (OFs) from these areas. Despite all these, the Philippine economy was strong in 2012 and many were pleasantly surprised when the 1Q12 GDP recorded growth of 6.4%. This momentum was maintained throughout the year, with 3Q12 GDP growth at 7.1%. In addition, the country’s credit rating was upgraded in 2012. Standard & Poor’s and Moody’s both raised the country’s rating to just one notch below investment grade. These upgrades are positive signs that an investment grade may be achievable before the current administration ends its term. The backdrop of a healthy domestic economy and encouraging investor environment buoyed the property market in 2012.

The O&O industry remained the primary driver of demand in the office market. The O&O industry continued to expand in 2012, bringing total office take-up in Metro Manila over the 400,000-sqm mark. Despite the large office supply completed during the year, average vacancy across business districts in the metro remained low at approximately 5%.

Meanwhile, OF remittances continued to grow in 2012, despite economic difficulties in such source countries as the US and Europe. For the first ten months of 2012, personal remittances grew 5.9% y-o-y to USD 19.5 billion. The sustained inflow of remittances supported the retail sector and demand for residential housing throughout the year. The growth of consumer spending buoyed by remittances attracted more international and local retailers to expand in the country. In the residential market, OF remittances continued to support the healthy sales rate of major projects.

The projected growth of the O&O industry and OF remittances, coupled with the country’s strong economic fundamentals and overall positive investor sentiment, is likely to carry the real estate market through 2013, despite the global headwinds. If the Philippine Stock Exchange index (PSEi) reaching the 6,000-level early this year is any indication, then the outlook for the local economy and the real estate market looks bright.

About the author
Jessica Mae Go is an Assistant Manager for Jones Lang LaSalle in Philippines, based in Manila.

A Good Start To The Year

Monday, January 7th, 2013

Asia fared better than other regions last year, but it too has not been immune to what’s been happening in the world’s economies over the last 12 months. This is evident given the new economic data from Singapore which shows that Singapore narrowly missed slipping into a recession in the fourth quarter with economic growth of only 1.8% (Q-o-Q annualised) in the fourth quarter.

So, now with 2012 in the past, what will 2013 have in store?

Well, certainly if the start to the New Year is anything to go by, things globally are looking a little rosier. Before I’d even set foot back into the office, the US fiscal cliff deal had bolstered equities markets around the globe; the FTSE was over the 6,000 mark for the first time in 18 months, and the Hang Seng up over 3%. Indeed as at the 4th of January, these bourses are up considerably on a y-o-y basis, nearly 12% and 30% respectively.

Being in the research business I understand just how important quality information is. Our clients buy the Real Estate Intelligence Service (REIS) for a reason, sometimes they need concrete historical data and forecasts, sometimes they need access to observations and people on the ground.

On this basis, and given I’ve just completed my busiest time of the year out and about meeting up with clients and potential clients to discuss their plans for the year ahead, I thought I’d bring you some of my take-aways. Hopefully some of these high level observations may provide a little insight as to what may be in-store for us in Asia Pacific’s real estate markets in 2013.

By observation, there seems to be an air of confidence regarding Asia Pacific going into 2013. The region in general is very much on investors’ radars, possibly even more so than before. Interestingly, South East Asia which had not been in the sights of some clients, seems to be back on the agenda. China is still very much in favour and I continue to see increased interested in our REIS services for this market – something which I think bodes well given that this is a potential leading indicator for where clients may deploy capital.

Clients new and old alike, seem to be focusing their sights and refining their strategies – especially on the debt and investment front. For some investors 2011/2012 was a period of restructure, however with these restructures mainly worked through and now with tighter leaner teams at the fore, these investors are now in better shape to move forwards in 2013.

Indeed, if the latest RMB billion land transaction in Beijing is anything to go by, the highest premium paid at auction in two years, then the sun is still shining!

A Happy New Year, may it be good to all of us!

To access a taster of some of the key real estate indicators available through REIS, download our NEW mobile site to your handset at www.joneslanglasalle.com/datatouch.

About the author
Roddy Allan is a Director, Asia Pacific Research for Jones Lang LaSalle, based in Hong Kong.

Value Of India Real Estate: Sprint To Marathon

Monday, December 3rd, 2012

In mid-2010, India’s investment grade real estate that was under construction joined the 100-billion-dollar club. Currently, the value of the investment grade real estate in India that is under construction is estimated to be USD 173.9 billion (nearly 35% more than Vietnam’s nominal GDP), a figure that has grown from USD 160.1 billion in 2Q11 and USD 101.3 billion in 2Q10. Following a steep rise of 58% y-o-y during 2Q11, the past 15 months have seen the value of these projects grow by a mere 8.6%. Rising input costs in recent quarters and an unenthused macro-economic sentiment have led to relatively fewer new construction starts in the sector compared to 2010. Between then and now, the country’s real estate market has traversed from a great deal of positivity to uncertainty. With 2012 nearly through, it hard to deny that it has been a forgettable year for the Indian realty market.


Source: Real Estate Intelligence Service, Jones Lang LaSalle

The market value of the commercial (office and retail) real estate that is under construction is USD 41.6 billion. The commercial office space that is under development contributes approximately 78% to the estimated market value of the commercial sector. The nominal decrease in supply, which was offset by a marginal rise in capital values, caused the share of the market value of commercial (office and retail) assets that are under construction to remain range bound to the figures estimated in 2010 and 2011. As the number of malls that were under development dropped and the size of malls increased, compared to 2Q11, the market value of retail assets that were under construction remained unaltered during 3Q12.

The Tier I cities of Mumbai, NCR-Delhi and Bangalore contribute approximately 67% to the market value of the commercial office space that is under construction, while the Tier II cities of Chennai, Pune, Hyderabad and Kolkata contribute about 17%. Other investment grade developments in Tier III cities contribute about 16% to today’s Pan-India market value. With infrastructure developments and relatively lower real estate costs, the share of the market value of Tier III cities grew from 9% in 2Q10 to 16% presently. While Tier I cities have contributed about 58% of the commercial retail space that is under development, Tier II and Tier III cities supplied approximately 27% and 15%, respectively.

Unlike the commercial sector, due to the increased construction activity and rapid recovery of property prices since their trough levels in mid-2009, the contribution of the residential sector has grown The market value of residential real estate that was under construction increased from 66% in 2Q10 to 76% in 3Q12, touching USD 132.3 billion, a figure that nearly doubles the levels seen in 2Q10. While NCR-Delhi has the largest volume of residential properties currently being developed, Mumbai contributes a larger share to the market value. Aided by its self-liquidating nature and the high demand for housing in India, the resilient residential sector has been the focus of developers and investors.

About the author
Hariharan Ganesan is the Senior Manager, Research for Jones Lang LaSalle in India, based in Mumbai.

Averting The Property Bubble In The Philippines

Thursday, November 22nd, 2012

I am often asked if there is a property bubble developing in the Philippine property sector, specifically in the residential condominium segment. The anxiety brought on by this question is allayed by the recent activity that has been seen in other mature markets, such as Singapore and Hong Kong, where the government has played an active role in curbing the excessive escalation of property prices.

In the Philippines, the Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas recently ordered banks to provide additional details about their real-estate exposure, requiring them to provide details on: (1) the investments in debt and equity securities that fund property ventures and the loans given to property developers; and (2) the ancillary services relating to the construction and development of real estate projects such as the buying, selling, renting and managing of these real estate properties.

Some market players saw this move as a pre-emptive measure to curb any property bubble that might be developing as a result of the unprecedented amount of building seen in the country, especially in the high-rise condominium market. There are currently around 130,000 luxury-to-mid-end residential condominium units in Metro Manila, and over 1.2 times or some 150,000 units are expected to complete within the next five years.

In terms of asset performance, the bigger picture indicates a fairly moderate growth. The compound average annual growth rate of resale capital values between 2009 and 2012 has been 11%, in a sample of the existing luxury and high mid-end condominium developments in the Makati CBD and Bonifacio Global City. Additionally, the average sale prices of new developments have exhibited a similar trend during the same period.

The hard lessons learned during the 1997 Asian Financial Crisis have prompted local regulators and developers to promulgate measures to prevent a property bubble from developing. Further, the regulators are motivated to prevent further disruptions in the market (which are likely to be brought by a property bubble) as the economy is set to receive upgraded credit and investment ratings from reputable rating agencies.

The challenge today is for both the regulators and the key market players to work together in analysing the sector by ensuring that the market information they provide is transparent and reliable. Hence, we believe that a more in-depth study of the various factors affecting the growth in the high end residential segment should be conducted to accurately determine the situation and aid the regulators in prescribing a more targeted preventive measure to avert any property bubble from developing.

About the author
Claro Cordero Jr. is the Head of Research, Consulting & Valuation Advisory for Jones Lang LaSalle in the Philippines.

Chongqing Highlights

Wednesday, November 14th, 2012

Over the past two months, I have been working with our Chongqing team to prepare the launch of the World Winning Cities – Chongqing profile. This paper, which we plan to release before the Chinese New Year, discusses the themes that underpin the continued growth momentum of Chongqing – the “World’s Fastest Growing Large City” – with average GDP growth exceeding 15% y-o-y since 2005.

A quick preview of the key takeaways about Chongqing discussed in the paper:

  • Chongqing benefits from extensive support from the Central Government with the Go West Initiative and receives high visibility with investors, corporates and the Central Government with its status as the only provincial-level municipality in inland China
  • Inland focus is a structural trend – and underpins persistent economic growth. Chongqing is one of the few provinces that have continued to see double digit FDI growth during the period of global economic uncertainties in 2012
  • Cheap labour is not the only draw – Infrastructure improvements and favourable policies have successfully attracted key multinationals and their supply chains allowing the city to establish scale and strong reputation in manufacturing sectors
  • Not surprisingly, our findings on the medium term opportunities coincide with the sectors highlighted in our China50 report, namely retail and logistics.

    For logistics, improving infrastructure and greater integration with the country and the world will further add pressure to supply shortages. The combination of limited supply and strong demand should result in above average returns for logistics property.

    Retail fundamentals are tied to rapid wage increases resulting from the city’s urbanisation process. As Chongqing increases its current urbanisation rate of 55% (low relative to its Tier 1.5 peers), consumer spending growth and changing retail spending patterns will drive demand for more and better retail. And while there has been significant improvement in Chongqing’s retail infrastructure over the past year, current retail offerings – either in terms of total quantity or diversity – still lag cities of comparable size and income level. Given the city’s relatively low income levels and favourable economic outlook, we believe socio-economic factors will provide a good demand base for retail assets in the city.

    We look forward to formally introducing the report to you in early 2013!

    About the author
    Amy Pan is an Associate Director in Research and heads up Real Estate Intelligence Service (REIS) China for Jones Lang LaSalle. She is based in Shanghai.

    Excuse Me, Can I Talk About Yields?

    Wednesday, October 3rd, 2012

    If I got a pound, a dollar or even a dong for every time I’m asked about yields, I would indeed not be sitting in an office in Hong Kong, I’d be retired and lying back on a boat in the Caribbean slurping rum!

    Investors regularly compare potential deals against aggregate metrics, however it’s important to truly understand what you’re comparing.

    This subject is a minefield and indeed I can’t even attempt to be comprehensive here, but I’ll try and cover the three main measures.

    The first and simplest aggregate yield to use for benchmarking an actual transaction or deal against is Market Yield. This is a simple yield calculated by taking net effective market rent and dividing it by market capital values. This measure assumes full occupancy and does not take into account any costs associated with the transaction itself or leasing. So, if I’m looking to buy a house today and rent it out, this is an absolutely perfect metric to benchmark the yield of my house versus the market average. Similarly, if I was looking at a newly completed office tower or a development asset, this would also be a good number to look at.

    Most international real estate investors are not looking to buy just one house with one tenant, nor indeed in most cases are they looking to buy a brand new asset. In reality, if an investor is looking at a deal to buy a stabilised asset such as an office tower, then the tenants are likely to have signed leases at different times based on the prevailing market rent at that time. So, this makes the situation generally somewhat more complex.

    In this case, with a stabilised asset, one needs to compare the deal to an aggregate yield measure which would attempt to take account of the rent roll in the market. In an ideal world, one should compare the deal number with the prevailing Cap Rate for the market. A market Cap Rate is essentially the average yield of recent comparable transactions in the market, but you’re only liable to be able to get access to a market Cap Rate in the most highly transparent and liquid real estate investment markets in the world, like Australia.

    For this reason, in markets such Asia, where there are a relatively small number of deals, then proper Cap Rates are just not available, because there’s just not sufficient transactional data to calculate them. So what is the best aggregate measure to look at in this case? The answer is Effective Passing Yield.

    Effective Passing Yield is similar to Market Yield in that it assumes full occupancy and excludes transactions costs, but what it attempts to do is to simulate the rent roll in the market. Essentially, it’s calculated by taking the average of the market rent over the average lease term in the market, and then dividing this by the current capital value of the market. By using this number, you’re able to compare your deal with the market in a more comparable fashion, because the number you’re comparing it with factors in a rent roll.

    Of course any specific deal or asset will have attributes that affect the yield of that specific deal – quality, location, fit-out, tenants. That said in general, one of the three yield measures above should provide a sound basis for comparison.

    Jones Lang LaSalle’s Real Estate Intelligence Service (REIS) provides a number of yield metrics to clients. I hope this simplistic look at yields serves some purpose and if you want more information, by all means pick up the phone if you’re willing to contribute a dong towards my retirement fund!

    About the author
    Roddy Allan is a Director, Asia Pacific Research for Jones Lang LaSalle, based in Hong Kong.

    Why Strong Demographics Is Good For The Philippine Property Market

    Wednesday, September 26th, 2012

    Several studies conducted by economic think tanks and investment banks have recognised the growing population of the Philippines as an economic asset now and in the near future. A growing population means a growing workforce and a larger consumer base that could propel future economic growth for the country.

    As of May 2010, the Philippine population stood at 92.1 million, with a median age of 23.4 years old – considered to be within the most economically active age cohorts of 21 to 35 years. The majority of the workforce in the offshoring & outshoring (O&O) industry – one of the strongest contributors to the economic growth in the Philippines – belong to this age group.

    Locally, the attractive compensation packages offered by O&O firms have attracted a considerable proportion of this working population, effectively raising the disposable incomes of many O&O workers. This has consequentially supported their demand for a wider range of goods and services, including real estate.

    This heightened consumer appetite has also translated to a greater demand for retail goods, encouraging retailers to take up more spaces, improving the occupancy level in retail establishments. While the growth in the O&O industry is not the only factor behind the surge in consumer demand, it is a sizeable market that has some retail establishments adjusting their operating hours to cater to the working hours of this industry. There has also been a recent emergence of retail offerings on the ground floors of office and residential developments, particularly in the established commercial business districts of Makati and Ortigas as well as in the emerging urban district of Bonifacio Global City where there is a large agglomeration of the O&O companies.

    The effect is more visible in the residential property sector, especially in the mid-end residential condominium market. Higher disposable income in the O&O workforce has made it now one of the key target markets for property developers. These workers are mostly single who prefer studio-type units. Equally they have the potential to become upgraders in the near future as their disposable incomes rise or when they form new households through marriages. Although renters make up most of this demographic, some are buying condominium units – either as end-users or investors – supporting the demand in the residential market.

    Admittedly, the country’s young and growing population is not enough to ensure the growth of the local property sector. Equally, strong government support is needed to further improve the human capital as well as sustain and enhance the country’s economic conditions. Nevertheless, we cannot deny the economic benefits of the country’s young and growing demographics on the Philippine economy and the property market.

    About the author
    Jan-lo de los Reyes is the Senior Research Analyst for Jones Lang LaSalle in Philippines.